Tuesday, 15 December 2009

BA to take legal action over strike!





British Airways is to take legal action over the strike action of its workers. The very right to strike is being undermined by a bullish management who are refusing to negotiate.

After dismissing support for strike action, management at BA must have been shocked to see the results of the ballot, on an 80 per cent turnout, 92.5 per cent voted for 12 days of striking over Christmas.Tuesday's Morning Star editorial condenses the situation nicely(http://www.morningstaronline.co.uk/index.php/news/content/view/full/84491)

BA will point to 'irregularities' in the ballot, due to the strict anti-union laws, that Thatcher brought in and New Labour refused to remove, going on strike now-a-days is no walk in the path. The sheer effort it takes to jump through all the bureaucratic hoops is designed in order to ensure that management can dismiss the legitimacy of a strike ballot. For instance, the union has to track down every member, find out where they work, who they are..... if just one person moved, or doesn't work there anymore, the ballot becomes void. It is absolutely crazy.

It is the Taff Vale of our generation. For those of you unfamilar with the case, in 1901, the Amalgamated Society of Railway Servants went on strike in response to the unfair treatment of its members. When the Taff Vale Railway Company employed scabs to undermine the strike, some union members got carried away and committed minor acts of sabotage, such as greasing the rails and uncoupling the carriages. The Railway Company however, decided to sue to union for damages and won.

In 1901, my great-great-Grandfather, George Thaxton, was president of the union and was involved in the court case and the campaign to reverse the ruling. He lead a very interesting live. Born in Horsham St Faith, Norfolk, in 1852. His mother was a widow, so he went to work at 5 years old picking up stones from the fields. To demonstrate the rural surroundings he grew up in, as a teenager, he used to walk 14 miles in order to visit his girlfriend.

Due to the lack of opportunities in Norfolk, George Thaxton moved to Hunslet, in Leeds and, in his early twenties, become a goods guard. He was one of the initial agitators who established the Midlands Goods Guards association. This early pioneer of British trade unionism was recieved with a degree of scepticism, the men had to stand in the manager’s office and ask permission to form the union.

Like many working men of his time, George was self-educated, he went to a Quaker nightschool after he finished work, where he learnt to read and write. He was elected to the executive committee of the Amalgamated Society of Railway Servants, 1887-1888, and then 1895-1901, and again in 1912. He was President from 1899-1901. In 1901, he participated in the Taff Vale court case and shortly after he visted, what must have appeared to be another planet back in those days, Australia, on a union delegation.

While he was President in 1899, a member from Doncaster proposed that the Trade Union Congress call a special conference to found a party to represent the working class. The Union remained one of the loudest voices for such a party.

George lived through some interesting times and he is an example of how the Labour movement can transform an ordinary working class man into a legend. He went on to became the first Labour alderman of Leeds city council, he was asked to become the Lord Mayor, but his wife was pregnant at the time and didn’t think she could perform of the role of being a mayor’s wife. He was also asked to stand for newly formed labour party in Northern Ireland, but he declined the offer.

The actions of the BA management are the culmination of long campaign to undermine trade union rights, looking at past struggles we see how these rights were not given to us, they were fought for and we need to fight to retain them.

Tuesday, 8 December 2009

Viva MAS!


With the news that President Evo Morales has won this latest election with a bigger majority than he got in 2005, will the advance of the left in Latin America ever stop?

Evo Morales has big plans for his second term. He is hoping to implement a new constitution and place the traditionally discriminated against indigenous people at the heart of Bolivia's government and society.

May President Morales use the profits made from his country's natural gas industry to build schools, hospitals and bring all the downtrodden of Boliva out of poverty.


Long live the Movement towards socialism!

Monday, 30 November 2009

Stitch up

So the USA has recognised the new honduran president, who was 'elected' in the face of brutal political repression of supporters of the legitimate president.

At the time of the coup, I assumed that US people of the ground had to be involved, as they were present at the army bases, but I didn't think that the coup had the backing of the White House. Now I realise I must have been wrong, judging from Washington's reaction.

Thank god once more for President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva of Brazil, who has vowed not to move President Zelaya from the Brazillian embassy.

We have also recently witnessed a torrent of abuse from the Guardian, acusing Cuba of human rights abuses, with no referance to the human rights abuses committed by America at Guantanamo Bay, or the effects to the US blockade. Rob Miller, secretary of the Cuba Solidarity Campaign has written a great reply that puts the right-wing little Cold-war warrior back in his place.

Is anyone in the mainstream press going to highlight the hypocracy of the United States?

Tuesday, 24 November 2009

de Menezes' family settles their son's case


Jean Charles de Menezes' family has settled for a £100,000 Met payout.

Jean happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time, and he was shot dead for it. Jean was followed by several plainclothes police officers as he left his flat for several minutes, he boarded a bus, as did his pursuers. Jean got to Brixton station, but as it was closed he rang a workmate saying he was going to be late and again boarded a bus. This is obviously the behaviour of a terrorist, as the police,satisfied that they had their man, decided to go after the man who "had Mongolian eyes". "Code red" was given and the police were authorised to prevent Jean from getting on a train at Stockwell tube station.

Contrary to reports that came out at the time, de Menezes used his Oyster card and did not jump over the barrier. Jean got onto a train, no warning was given, one eye-witness said that de Menezes appeared calm as police guns were thrust onto his head.

Two officers fired a total of eleven shots according to the number of empty shells found on the floor afterwards. de Menezes was shot seven times in the head and once in the shoulder, he died at the scene. The shots were fired over a thirty second period.

The murder of the Brazilian electrician represented everything that was wrong with the paranoid post-9/11 atmosphere that Tony Blair's government created. It is New Labour's hands that are covered in de Menezes blood.

Settled for only £100,000.

Sounds a terribly low amount considering it is the price of a life. You would have thought that if an innocent member of your family had been executed by the police, you would want to sue for millions, but it is a bit better than the £15,000 that the Met offered immediately after the murder in July of 2005. The money will certainly go a lot further in Brazil i guess.

This closure seems a very unsatisfying end to what was, at the end of the day, a murder. Along with the poor little girl killed when an RAF plane dropped a box of leaflets on her and the bomb that ripped through a wedding convoy in Iraqi, the murder of de Menezes was just another terrible byproduct of the ridiculous war on terror.

Sunday, 22 November 2009

Lib-Lab?

A new poll for the Observer indicates a that the next general election will result in a hung parliament. Labour has narrowed the Tories lead to only 6 points, according to a Ipsos Mori poll of 1,006 people, the Tories are on 37%, Labour on 31% and the Lib Dems on 17%.

This begs the question, what government would have in the event of a hung parliament?
The Liberal Democrats have certainly moved to the right in recent years, but they would never be able to get a coalition with the tories past their membership, could they?

The best possiblity would certainly be a Lib Dem-Labour coalition, this formation could be seen to represent a united centre-left, that could avoid, to some extent, the brutality of a tory government. We could infer that the conditions for a Lib Dem-labour cooperation would be the implementation of proportional representation, further constitutional reform, perhaps the reversal of some anti-terror legislation?


In the tradition of that great Yeovil M.P Paddy Ashdown, there is somewhat of an overlap between liberals and New Labour. Certainly most liberals I have ever met would be happier in government with Labour, than the Tories. Back in 1997, Paddy Ashdown and Tony Blair established the 'Joint Cabinet Committee' (JCC) which was used to discuss the implementation of the two parties' shared priorities for constitutional reform; its remit was later expanded to include other issues on which Blair and Ashdown saw scope for co-operation between the two parties. Although this never came to anything, perhaps in the shadow of a tory government this could be a possibility.

But what is the reality of this actually happening?

Former Liberal Democrat leader Ming Campbell has stated:
"If Armageddon happened and we were faced with a Tory government, then the argument for increased co-operation with the centre left might not be a matter of choice, but a matter of compulsion."

In the background of Cameron's links to Anti-European, Neo-Nazi, homophobe, climate change deniers, liberals will naturally be drawn closer to Labour. I think that a Lib Dem-labour coalition is certainly not only a possibility that could occur, but would be miles preferable to a Tory government.

Personally, I still hope that Labour is able to win alone, but this kind of coalition is certainly a distinct possibility.

Sunday, 15 November 2009

Morning Star on the BBC!


A comrade told me that the Morning Star was shown on BBC 24's newspaper round up, that mainly focused on the BA situation. This appears to be confirmed by tomorrow's fighting fund:

http://www.morningstaronline.co.uk/index.php/news/content/view/full/5909


A fantastic achievement. Our 'Daily Miracle' is a constant source of ispiration to so many in the labour movement and progressive politics. It is our paper and we really do have to support it, because if it goes, it would take generations for it to come back.

Congratulations to everyone who works at William Rust House!

Long live the Morning Star!

Friday, 13 November 2009

At last something to celebrate

Well done Scottish Labour in Glasgow North East!

A great result that displays not only the appeal of Labour in its core constituencies, but also due to the fact that Gordon Brown was campaigning there, it proves Gordon is not the electoral liability that certain people want to convey to the nation.

However, the turnout was pathetic at 33 percent, this clearly displays the people of Glasgow North East's regard for mainstream bourgeois politicians. This was the primary reason (along with a lot of campaigning) for the good result for the BNP which was 1,013, only a few votes off the tories and 17 below the required amount to save their deposit.

The number of Left candidates was farcical, nevertheless, Sheridan still managed to beat the Lib Dems, it is always funny to see them wiped off the map.

Overall, a good result for Labour, hopefully it displays that Cameron's lies have yet to win over the people of Glasgow.

Results:

LAB - 12,231
SNP- 4,120
CON - 1075
BNP - 1013
SOL - 794
LIB-DEM - 474
GREEN - 332
SSP - 152
SLP - 47